Tensions are escalating in the Pusiga District as the selection process for the next District Chief Executive (DCE) has sparked allegations of ethnic favouritism, overshadowing merit and party loyalty.

The controversy has raised concerns about the integrity of the selection process and its potential impact on the unity of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) in the region.

Reports indicate that Benjamin Atuasi, the NDC's Upper East Regional Deputy Communication Officer, has been excluded from the selection process, despite his significant contributions to the party's success in the 2024 general elections.

Sources suggest that powerful party figures are manipulating the process to promote a candidate of their choice, dismissing Atuasi’s dedication and efforts. One of the key arguments against Atuasi’s candidacy is his supposed geographic proximity to the current Member of Parliament (MP),  Laadi Ayii Ayamba, both hailing from similar regions.

However, Atuasi’s supporters have vehemently refuted this claim, stating that Atuasi is from the Terago Electoral Area, while the MP is from Pusiga Natinga Electoral Area, effectively rendering the argument irrelevant.

Supporters of Atuasi further emphasize his strong grassroots support, noting that he is well-regarded by both the youth and elderly in the district.

They argue that his track record in party communication and dedication to mobilizing supporters position him as a more capable candidate than others currently being endorsed by influential figures.

There are growing calls for a fair and transparent selection process, with party members advocating for an ethnically balanced leadership. The directive to ensure that not all three shortlisted candidates come from the same ethnic group is being seen as a violation of the NDC’s principles of inclusivity and diversity.

As the controversy deepens, some party members are concerned that the biased selection could lead to internal divisions and undermine the NDC’s chances in future elections. Despite mounting pressure, the party leadership has yet to publicly address the concerns surrounding the process, leaving many to question whether the selection will truly reflect merit and party unity