An Accra High Court, presided over by Justice Mary Yanzuh, has made a ruling stating that the trial of James Gyakye Quayson, a member of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), will be conducted on a daily basis starting from July 4, 2023.

The court declared that its previous order, issued on June 16, outlining this arrangement was in accordance with the law, and there was no basis for a review.

The judge emphasized that adjournments are determined by the court's discretion, not the convenience of the parties involved. She stated that the court's order was clearly in line with the law, and there was no demonstration that it contravened any legal provisions.

The judge further stated that the court's refusal to grant Quayson additional time for campaigning did not infringe upon his rights or deny him a fair trial. 

She asserted that the court's decision alone does not constitute a denial of the right to a fair trial.

Lawyers representing Quayson had requested a review of the court's order, arguing that he needed time to campaign before the Assin North by-election on June 27. 

They presented documents to the court, alleging prejudicial comments made by the Attorney General that could impact the case.

However, Justice Yanzuh ruled that these statements were not relevant to the matter at hand and did not warrant a review. 

She explained that the only new information presented was the alleged prejudicial comments by the Attorney General, which she deemed irrelevant to her decision.

The judge adjourned the proceedings to June 29 and July 4, taking into account the unavailability of the specific courtroom on Mondays, the upcoming by-election, and the upcoming holiday. Following these dates, the trial will proceed on a day-to-day basis.

Deputy Attorney General Diana Asonaba Dapaah expressed that the court's decision aligns with established legal principles, emphasizing that it is the court's prerogative to determine the hearing dates, not the convenience of the accused.

Baba Jamal, a member of Quayson's legal team, expressed satisfaction with the decision, stating that their main purpose was to secure time for campaigning. 

He acknowledged that their application was dismissed but affirmed their contentment with the trial proceeding on a day-to-day basis after the by-election.